Agenda (1/5/21) Update / Review DRAFT - Koa Platform Release Notes Site Configuration & White Label update: it seems like the Open edX community isn’t interested in supporting this functionality Can we talk to enterprise about removing these with assistance from DEPR? We have code, templates, and data that all should be removed, but can be removed separately talk to the service owners about removing site-specific code as well. does it make sense to deprecate this directly? exclude: theming for now
Check in with Revenue team about https://openedx.atlassian.net/browse/DEPR-90 2021 Goals
- Nimisha Asthagiri (Deactivated) write a DEPR ticket to gauge community reactions to the deprecation, offer up eduNext model as an alternative
- Diana Huang communicate with enterprise team about future plans to deprecate white label and get buy in and support
Agenda (1/19/21) - Agenda (2/2/21) Agenda (2/16/21) Agenda (3/2/21) Agenda (3/16/21) Last XModule removed from edx-platform! Set up pinata celebration? “One idea: When we retired Vertica recently, we each wrote Vertica tributes that were poems/odes/prose/limericks - and bbeggs read them all. That could be expanded to add PPT/Sheets presentations? And maybe fanfiction? Songs?” - Data Engineering Round robin reading of odes Mail everyone in the company one (1) piece of candy Origami pinatas that people can make it at home Ask Usman to stream himself destroying a pinata Send something out digitally for people to do themselves Sarina Canelake (Do Not Use) (Deactivated) to organize this.
Removal dates for DEPR tickets: can we just say this is the acceptance date? https://openedx.atlassian.net/browse/DEPR-108 https://openedx.atlassian.net/browse/DEPR-123 Community is not comfortable with replacing front ends with MFEs No Tutor plugins or single-install support yet Planning for Lilac to ship with a few MFEs as a sort of test case
Can we measure the metric of DEPR work? Meta discussion
Agenda (3/30/21) - Discuss metrics discovery lines of code metric recouped cost of upgrade Focus on fewer metrics
Remove XQueue Watcher? Only 1 Partner uses it: MIT only for 7.QBWx and 6.00x courses. What is the purpose of this feature? Can it be either deprecated or deemed to be useful for other partners? caused problems with the 20.04 upgrade XQueue/XQWatcher Architecture if we deprecate this, can we also deprecate XQueue? we need a followup discussion (maybe with TNL? Ed? Feanil? Peter Pinch?) about what we need to do to get rid of this
- Understand the need for XQueue Watcher and its future
- Diana Huang to respond to just mention the general guidelines.
Agenda (5/14/21) - Agenda (6/8/21) - Agenda (6/22/21) - Agenda (7/6/21) - - Diana Huang - create DEPR tickets for Devstack deprecations
pycontracts Review of DEPR board
Agenda (7/20/3221) - Devstack DEPR tickets next steps Check in on making more DEPR blended projects Stats on ticket creation - who is making them?
Agenda (8/3/21) - Agenda (8/17/21) Blended Brief(s) Engineering All-Hands
Agenda (8/31/21) Agenda (9/28/21) - https://openedx.slack.com/archives/C023AGJJWLV/p1630005387002200Remove Jenkins jobs We are moving things to Github actions Can’t use the Github-hosted runners, need to spin up self-hosted runners with SRE support
RequireJS When can we move us off of Require to Webpack May need to be a FEDx-led project to help fill in expertise gaps Can we make this a Blended dev project? Diana Huang reach out to the FEDx group about next steps
Hacking time
Agenda (10/26/21) - Agenda (11/9/21) - |