Content Comparison

...

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

• Feanil Patel

...

⏮️ Previous TODOs

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

...

Item	Presenter	Notes
		Previous TODOs: FedX is looking into edx/brand-edx.org braze-client - still needs some more looking into this. edx-name-affirmation can be made public, Cosmonauts will look into this.
React 18 Upgrade	Adolfo Brandes	Forum thread: https://discuss.openedx.org/t/react-18-in-teak/15013 Roadmap issue: https://github.com/openedx/platform-roadmap/issues/429 Frontend-base - experimental in Ulmo default in Verawood It will still always be possible to deploy MFEs as separate services but the mechanics will be a little different. Tutor will likely run all the MFEs in a single shell.
edx-val maintainership	Jeremy Ristau	Aurora team would like to propose themselves as maintainers. What is step 1? This is a forum post, CC rights expansion and nomination for maintainer in one post. Here: https://discuss.openedx.org/c/working-groups/core-contributors/36
Maintainership		Andrés González has a few folks that are ready to help with maintenance and need help choosing some repositories to focus on.
Legacy Studio Frontend Deprecation		https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/issues/36275

✅ Action items

•  Feanil Patel Jeremy Ristau follow up about the name-affirmation repo and whethere it should remain part of the edx org.
•  Feanil Patel Ticket up frontend-base transition on the maintenance board/platform-roadmap so maintainers know it’s coming.
•  Jeremy Ristau to dig into the videos page in studio and what the current state of that is in the studio code.

⤴ Decisions