Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|
10-15 minutes | Chip updates
| Adam Stankiewicz (on behalf of Jennifer Gregory) | Coming back for (final?) review of Chip component Figma spec: https://www.figma.com/file/eGmDp94FlqEr4iSqy1Uc1K/Paragon-Design-System?type=design&node-id=53755-39670&mode=dev If decided as ready for dev, implementation issue for Raccoon Gang:
Decision: ready for dev! Jeff/Jenn may clarify hover (selected) state, but not blocking. Will implement as is. |
10 mins | Contrast checker and Accessibility page | Vladyslav Zadorozhnii
| https://github.com/openedx/paragon/issues/2647 https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/
Challenge: often difficult for consumers of Paragon to easily test color contrasts outside of design specific tools. Q: Is this a useful contribution to Paragon docs site (maybe the A11y page)? |
5 mins | Form.Autosuggest attributes PR | Mena Hassan | |
5 mins | Label association | Vladyslav Zadorozhnii Anastasiia Abyzova (Deactivated) | Image AddedWhat are next steps? Regarding deprecation of floating labels, we seem to agree this a direction we want to go in. We’re unsure who final decider is, but should be driven through the 2U design group. [concern] Might added design work with certain use cases to find alternatives to display labels vs. floating labels.
|
| | @praviola | https://www.figma.com/file/fdWLivj6C12NVbwlUTYvWi/Search-results?type=design&node-id=514-22645&mode=design&t=6ABxC3V1YIIuGU6W-0 Notes Similar pattern to other use cases (including a searchable Dropdown ) Implementation will live in prospectus but if its a generic/standalone solution might be able to port it over to Paragon in a later iteration.
|