changes.mady.by.user Gabriel Weinberg
Saved on Sept 08, 2021
changes.mady.by.user Adam Stankiewicz
Saved on Jan 10, 2022
...
Time
Item
Presenter
Notes
Gabe
Should the 3 of us meet or sync more regularly for some reason?
We should be syncing as leads at least every couple of weeks or monthly to keep Paragon on the rails
How do we grow our capabilities?
What do you need to sync or stay aligned on?
Deciding what we will build, what needs updates, prioritizing design efforts, organizing technical work around the priorities
Think about Paragon as a product with customers, adoption, tech help, roadmap, regular evangelizing, could alter ho we think about paragon
Who are the customers, how are we documenting, when do we need to talk to developers. What is paragon doing well or not doing well.
Let’s act like a real product group, even though we are part time and limited in resources
What is our current paragon workforce?
Design, engineering?
Lots of blended? Not the right answer…
it does offer augmenting capacity
long its not a good solution bc we don’t have enough in house resources
front end and paragon support groups spinning up
where does tech lead go after that? take anew look at governance models
Front end can sometimes fall short, product thinking behind paragon can help drive it better
Theme demos! Visibility
Any time you use paragon, is there a way to make those successes reflect back on paragon
What are our measures of success that we can celebrate over time
Health + does it exist?
Arbiters of quality?
Ben
How do we control who should be able to be the final PR approver for Paragon PRs? What are our criteria?
How to we ensure all paragon components go through our design and review processes?
What do we do about issues with PRs that have merged, but were not caught because of missed review?