Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Date

Participants

Goals

Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

PAR board statuses

Gabriel Weinberg

  • Jira Board doesn’t reflect our current process. Statuses like “to do” and “in progress” are not clear enough against our current working process. Should reflect various stages of component life cycle, such as “ready for engineering” or “ready for design specs”. Proposed board status changes:

    • Needs proposal (needs detail in order for PWG to determine if it should be a component or variant)

    • Ready for design (PWG agrees it should be a component or variant, needs design specs)

    • Ready for review (Needs PWG input)

    • Ready for Engineering (design specs have been approved in PWG)

    • Ready for Q/A (design and technical)

    • Shipped (now live and usable by designers and engineers using Paragon)

  • Design system status proposal:

    • “Stable” (currently live and usable by designs)

    • “Needs Design Update“

    • “Needs Engineering Update“

    • “Deprecated” (no longer available for use)





Action items

  •  

Decisions

  • No labels