Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

[recurring?] Check-in on Paragon Insights Snowflake Dashboard

Adam Stankiewicz

https://app.snowflake.com/us-east-1/edx/#/paragon-insights-dS34Hf8Kn

What other metrics would you be interested in seeing to quantify and understand usage of Paragon?

[proposal] New KPI: “Hours saved”

Adam Stankiewicz

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PoRZBeaSKBYuxL3ok5F7jam9utRNCzYAuas0Fv1EXDE/edit?usp=sharing

Methodology:

  1. Assign a “complexity score” for both design & engineering for each component in the design system.

  2. Associate a reasonable estimate for number of hours for design & engineering for each scalar value in the “complexity score”.

  3. Sum the total design & engineering hours.

  4. Multiple the total hours by number of instances of each component throughout the Open edX platform.

  5. Sum the resulting hours for each component to result in “Total Hours Saved”.

Discussion:

  • [Adam] Thoughts on the methodology and/or the hours for each scalar value? The hours are intended to take into account the following:

    • Design

      • User research

      • Design

      • Design review

      • User testing

    • Engineering

      • Implementation

      • Tests

      • Code review

      • QA

  • [Adam] Should this KPI assume teams have to re-design & re-engineer each component from scratch each time?

  • [Adam] What about components that have multiple variants?

    • E.g., it might take X hours of time to build the Button component for all its variants, but as a team re-implementing from scratch, they presumably don’t need to build each variant per usage so the “hours saved” might be inflated.


Paragon roadmap

Adam Stankiewicz

[discuss] What will it take for us to get a public roadmap in place for both design & engineering by the Open edX conference?

Previous Architectural Roadmap

Goal:

  • Create and maintain a public, documented roadmap for the Paragon design system as it relates to Open edX.

Discussion:

Design Tokens… for Design

Adam Stankiewicz

[curious] What is the UX’s team appetite for moving to design tokens in Figma?

Tokens Studio

  • Legit single source-of-truth for design token values

    • May enable designers to sync with latest tokens on Github.

    • May enable designers to self-serve edit tokens and push to Github.

  • How would the design team resource the work to migrate to design tokens?

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels