| | | | |
|---|
Apr 26, 2018 | Review this wiki (Arch Lunch: 2018-05-May) | @Nimisha Asthagiri (Deactivated) | 5mns | |
Review Architecture Decision and Communication Process | @Nimisha Asthagiri (Deactivated) | 30mns | |
May 3, 2018 | Arch decisions and review | @Nimisha Asthagiri (Deactivated) | 5mns | |
Frontend/Backend split Which layer owns which business logic? That is, what is the separation of concern between various front-end layers, middleware services, and backend services? (parking lot from a previous arch-lunch.)
| @Ari Rizzitano (Deactivated) | 45mns | Interested stakeholders, please add specific use cases here. Registration page Submitting a problem
|
May 10, 2018 | This week is intentionally kept agenda-less to foster open-ended discussions. | Discussed |
May 17, 2018 | API strategy | @Douglas Hall (Deactivated), @Nimisha Asthagiri (Deactivated) | 45mns | Options v0 types of APIs - as long as standards are followed throttling permissions versioning deprecation strategy
idea of who is using what APIs on edx.org? any model API that is done the "right" way versus an API that isn't designed well? put more thought into our APIs versus implementing new APIs we have published APIs in the past, but regressed in docs for the time-being DDD-first design for curated APIs interfaces/APIs proposed plan (after-meeting discussion) small team dedicated to designing a few "intentional APIs" (a.k.a "API as a Product") that will be published in the API Gateway. the same team will revive and flesh out the API conventions, creating an OEP, so that new "emergent APIs" will also follow the new conventions. FED developers will continue to call Backend "emergent APIs", starting to use updated API conventions. Over-time, we will see how we evolve the API Gateway and how we transition and track "emergent APIs".
|
May 24, 2018 | | @Jeremy Bowman (Deactivated) | 45mns | |
May 31, 2018 | Open edX conference.
|