2021-09-09 Meeting notes

Date

Sep 9, 2021

Participants

@Gabriel Weinberg (Deactivated)
@Ben Warzeski (Deactivated)
@Jon F
@Jeff Witt (Deactivated)
@Adam Stankiewicz
@Carla Duarte (Deactivated)
@TJ Tracy (Deactivated)
@Ken Clary (Deactivated)

Goals

Align on how to proceed with merged code that still needs design review

Discussion topics

Time	Item	Presenter	Notes

Time	Item	Presenter	Notes
		@Ben Warzeski (Deactivated)	feat: Added CardSelect component by irfanuddinahmad · Pull Request #808 · openedx/paragon What to do with the CardSelect component that did not go through our design or review process? Problems: inflexible Initial design specs don’t match the merged code Fix forward or revert? Revert: +4 Fix forward: Semantics What is our community dev process? Design revisit specs and use cases Interaction specs, clickable inside card Process: reviewer group? checklist? pull request template? Should be working from a spec and proposal. Design system itself can act as a gatekeeper for consistency. Will design or tech debt be paid back within a reasonable time? Front end working group?
		@Ben Warzeski (Deactivated)	Should the select menu location move its location in the docsite?

Action items

Design to revisit use case and specs for the Selectable container component in Figma @Hilary Gordon (Deactivated)@Gabriel Weinberg (Deactivated)

Revert merge of CardSelect @Adam Stankiewicz

Review how to handle proposals from community for design and dev @Ben Warzeski (Deactivated)@Gabriel Weinberg (Deactivated)@Marco Morales (Deactivated)

Bring back to PWG for more collaboration next week

Decisions

Revert merge of code
Component rebuild for better flexibility
Design spec first, then code

Design System Documentation