2022-10-26 Meeting notes

 Date

Oct 26, 2022

 Participants

  • @Adam Stankiewicz

 Goals

  •  

 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

10-15 minutes

Common SVG Illustrations

@Adam Stankiewicz

@Alena Egorova

  • Should there be a common place to store frequently used illustrations? If so, where would it make sense to store them?

  • Would we need to store several color options for each SVG?

  • Are the illustrations edX.org specific or are they relevant to Open edX as well?

    • Likely edX.org specific due to colors, etc.

  • [Alena] Are there any guidelines around when to use which SVG?

  • Couldn’t get a license to redistribute which is why they are only in the design system Figma library

    • Could they be a separate NPM package?

    •  

  • Is there a framework for illustrations?

    • Placeholder illustrations by theme.

  • Figma


2 minutes


Deprecation of edX-bootstrap


@Jeff Witt


See https://edx-internal.slack.com/archives/C02BMP2RD5Y/p1666776944661039

  • DEPR ticket for edx-bootstrap

    • Bunch of stuff is still using it

    • Figuring out its dependencies.

  • We should compile a list of which repos use this edx-bootstrap repo.

  • Jeremy Bowman already thinking through a potential solution.

  •  

10 minutes

UX-focused gathering space

@Adolfo Brandes

  • At a previous meeting @Gabriel Weinberg offered to ask around about when/where we could start getting the community involved in UX discussions

  • I’ve (@Adolfo Brandes) been asked the same question, so I’m checking back

Notes:

  • Community also happy to just stay informed on what’s happening with design work, rather than actively contributing.

  • New FedX meeting is more technical in nature (FED), not so much design conversations.

  • [Gabe] Is this improvements to contributions to Paragon specifically? Or is it more for feature development across the platform?

  • 2U has largely driven design of Open edX, but tCRIL/community has desire to keep taps on design updates to these platforms.

  • PWG is probably not the right group for this purpose since not all feature work comes through PWG (only when a use case for new/updated component, for example).

  • FWG is also more technical in nature.

  • We’re looking for a cross-functional meeting for context/knowledge sharing around design.

  • Gabe + Adolfo to sync offline to find a better medium for these conversations.

  • Ali would also like to get involved in this

    • May also do an inform about this with Product Working Group.

 

 

@Ali Hugo

 Action items

 Decisions