2026-02-05 Meeting notes

• Seeking more maintainers

  • https://discuss.openedx.org/t/seeking-new-maintainers/18268/3

edx-platform

• PR for moving to pyproject.toml

  • Precursor to try moving to ruff and uv

Python APIs proposal

@Kyle McCormick

Asking people to check out proposal:

https://discuss.openedx.org/t/new-directory-structure-public-python-apis-for-openedx-platform/18330

openedx-platform

@Kyle McCormick

Renamed from edx-platform to openedx-platform. Issues to talk about when Feanil comes back:

• Documentation about the change

  • If it’s an href to the repo, things Just Work

  • Ensure docs build is renamed

  • Do before Verawood

  • Also figure out openedx-proposals (maybe Feanil did some magic there already)

Verawood testing plan?

@Robert Raposa

Performance testing/issues around Verawood

• Previously issues would be found in master at 2U servers

• Is there a plan? BTR?

  • “BTR does what they do”; performance has not been a priority; to change this, the group needs a broader membership; the group would be probably receptive to performance leadership

  • RacconGang has been writing Cypress tests; we hope to run these for/by Verawood; don’t know how comprehensive the testing will be; they’re not explicitly performance tests, though

  • MIT has been running master and contributing fixes to issues found in production(-like) environments; we don’t know how long they’ll continue doing this

  •  

React 18 support window?

@Adolfo Brandes

The React 18 support window is a bit murky. We should find out if we need to upgrade to 19 by Verawood.