Page Comparison

Round robin progress updates (4min each)

• RBAC (Bryan)

  • Next step - Get clear definition of the roles ASU needs ASAP and compare to edX MVP roles -

  • Full view into schedule/timeline

• File Management (Bryan)

  • Spanish needs - render structure on the side of the student/LMS - need is for instructors to share content with learners

• Graded Discussions (Cassie/Jenna/Elizabeth/Aamir)

  • Meeting on 6/13 with stakeholders from ASU, OC, Axim and 2U with following decisions/next steps for an MVP:

    • Will open grading across all discussions in a course rather than at the section level

    • Will focus on automated quantitative rubrics

    • Will have specific reqs around instructor override and a few others

  • Next step: Jenna, Aamir and Elizabeth to write a product spec for the MVP that will meet minimum requirements for ASU and deliver value to 2U

• Stats panels (Jenna)

  • Working with Felipe and Brian to distill the 54 identified data needs into three persona-based “products”: A set of reports/dashboard for site operators, a set of reports/dashboards for instructors for MOOCs, a set of reports/dashboards for instructors on campus

  • Next step: Feedback loop with educators' WG

• Blueprint/children courses (Jenna)

• SF Integration (Elizabeth/Fox)

• Studio Home (Jenna/Bryan)

  • MVP user stories complete: Studio Home MVP - Problem Statements

• ORA rubric (Ed)

  • Backlog of ORAs is created

• 3rd party plagiarism tools (Felipe)

  • No new updates

• Flexible grading (Jenna)

  • Use ticket for user stories

• Credentials (Ed)

  • Next step discovery on European standards

• Central LTI config management (Fox/Jenna)

Projects without owners

• Individual student emails

• Completion API

  • Felipe will own

• More flexible grouping options

• Grading period