...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
View the Github ticket for proposal status updates. |
|---|
Overview
It should be possible to grade participation in discussions and factor this grading into a learner’s score for a course.
...
Function | Admin | Discussion Admin* | Discussion Moderator* | TA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Manage graded discussion posts as per the existing discussion roles | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Create and manage graded discussion rubrics | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ |
Add / edit grades | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ |
Grant graded discussion permissions to existing team members | ✔ Can grant permissions to: Staff, Discussion Admins, Discussion Moderators, Group Community TAs & Community TAs | ✔ Can grant permissions to: Discussion Moderators, Group Community TAs & Community TAs | ✘ | ✘ |
Note:
|
|---|
Students can:
✔ View the discussion’s possible points | ||||
✔ View the grading rubric (how will points be awarded) | ||||
✔ View discussion description (how many posts, responses, word count etc) | ||||
✔ View the due date | ||||
✔ Add a post to a graded discussion |
...
If Enabled, the user has the option to add the following grading criteria:
(Note: for MVP, we’d like to leverage as much of the Open Response Assessment’s (ORA) UX and UI as possible)
Grading Description (ie. Prompt)
Schedule, eg:
Discussion start date and time
Discussion end date and time
Rubric
This will follow the current ORA rubric setup:
Criterion name (eg: Grammar and spelling)
Criterion prompt (ie. Description of how to evaluate a discussion post based on this criterion)
Options (eg. “Fair”, “Good”, or “Excellent”)
Each option has a Name, Explanation and Point value
...