Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|
5-10 mins | Notifications UI | Adam Stankiewicz | Web-based Notifications notifications UI: Tabs Figma
The notification bubble shown above differs from what exists in the implemented Tabs component today (docs):
[curious] Will/should there be a Paragon proposal to update the Tabs component’s notification? |
5-10 min
| CardGrid new prop
| Max Frank | To accommodate the ability to forward props to the Row that is wrapped inside this component. Here is a GH issue for more detail: https://github.com/openedx/paragon/issues/2478
This will enable us to make expandable CardGrid s more accessible: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA/Attributes/aria-expanded Questions for the group: Should this prod just forward an ID or do we want to support forwarding a list of props to the Row ? What should the prop be called?
Notes: Use case: “only show the first 3 cards, hide the remaining cards until user clicks a button.” [Ben] rowProps to keep it flexible/forward-looking. Document example of forwarding rowProps on the docs site. [Adam] Is this a pattern to specific to just this one application or could it be more broadly applicable as a pattern (native part of CardGrid )?
|
5 min | Potential breaking change to Paragon | Max Frank | PR to add support for aria-labelledby and props-forwarding to the SelectableBoxSet component: https://github.com/openedx/paragon/pull/2461
There is a discussion going on in the PR about how this is a breaking change because the label is actually required for this component to pass accessibility checks (Jeff or other a11y specialists feel free to jump in on this).
What I need from the group: PR is ready for another pass of review I will most likely need some guidance in regards to how we handle breaking changes. I can see how to format the commit message, but am wondering if there is any other protocol to follow? Any docs I can look at?
|
5 mins | Accessibility information for components on the Paragon docs site | Vladyslav Zadorozhnii | I think it is interesting to know what accessibility standards are used for specific component. Also it allows to revisit components accessibility. Solution: Put accessibility information in the table at the bottom of a component page. Maybe provide separate Accessibility page with basic information.
[idea] Table explaining the aria-* attributes, etc. with the reason(s) why. Extend the “Edit this page” [Jeff] “Need to know certain things to use components properly” Proposal: For each component, fill a11y info out on wiki page and collaborate with PWG / Jeff Witt and then carry over to docs site. Accessibility (a11y) Documentation (use this as a starting point). Could live alongside Confluence space for a11y.
[Ben] This also would help for testing with React Testing Library (e.g., getByRole ). Would be nice to have these documented. [Ben] Should Paragon provide component mocks for testing? Vlad to collaborate with Jeff over Slack. Jeff can meet to start working through these.
|
| A11y issues with Carousel? | | Side-scrolling for mobile screens? |