Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Page Properties
hiddentrue

Status

Status
colourGreen
titleREVIEWED

Contributing Team

Cassie Zamparini

Earlier Discovery

N/A

Github

https://github.com/orgs/openedx/projects/4/views/20?pane=issue&itemId=59871682

Linked Initiatives

Type

Proposal

Overview

It should be possible to grade participation in discussions and factor this grading into a learner’s score for a course.

View the Github ticket for proposal status updates.

...

Function

Admin

Discussion Admin*

Discussion Moderator*

TA

Manage graded discussion posts as per the existing discussion roles

Create and manage graded discussion rubrics

Add / edit grades

Grant graded discussion permissions to existing team members

Can grant permissions to: Staff, Discussion Admins, Discussion Moderators, Group Community TAs & Community TAs

Can grant permissions to: 

Discussion Moderators, Group Community TAs & Community TAs

Note:

  • Staff must be assigned a Discussion Admin, or Moderator role before being able to manage Discussions or Graded Discussions

  • The Group Community TA has the same permissions as a Community TA, except the Group Community TA can only manage specific discussion groups assigned to them.

Students can:

  View the discussion’s possible points

View the grading rubric (how will points be awarded)

  View discussion description (how many posts, responses, word count etc)

View the due date

  Add a post to a graded discussion

...

If Enabled, the user has the option to add the following grading criteria:
(Note: for MVP, we’d like to leverage as much of the Open Response Assessment’s (ORA) UX and UI as possible)

  • Grading Description (ie. Prompt)

  • Schedule, eg:

    • Discussion start date and time

    • Discussion end date and time

  • Rubric

    • This will follow the current ORA rubric setup:

      • Criterion name (eg: Grammar and spelling)

      • Criterion prompt (ie. Description of how to evaluate a discussion post based on this criterion)

      • Options (eg. “Fair”, “Good”, or “Excellent”)

        • Each option has a Name, Explanation and Point value

...