...
\uD83D\uDC65 Participants
\uD83E\uDD45 Goals
\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
5M | Action Item Follow Up |
| |
Follow Up | Event taxonomy: from the A-Z list of tracking event types, event types are inconsistently named, which makes filtering difficult.
| ||
5M | Action Item | I have a proposal for this wg: people who have worked in any analytics project can prepare a short presentation (10-20 min) about a technical topic and present it in the wg meeting. The idea is to talk in detail about a specific problem faced, and show how it was solved and what are the new challenges. Some examples: showing video statistics, converting logs to xAPI, extracting tracking logs, using datawarehouses, etc. It can be recorded and stored to create a data-wg knowledge center. If there is agreement on that, I can volunteer with the first one.
| |
5M | Check the mapping of problem related events (issue #15 on openedx/data-wg). A first proposal of the mapping of `problem_check` server event is available. Let’s see together what are the main information that remain in the xAPI standard and if it is enough ready to iterate on the other events
| ||
30M | Review of the currently know data use cases |
|
✅ Action items
- Andy Shultz (Deactivated)Dave Ormsbee (Axim) & Edward Zarecor will review Quitterie’s mapping of problem check to xAPI by the next meeting.
- Edward Zarecor Schedule a time for us to have a conversation about how to track issues around ethics in the data that is emitted from the platform. Should there be a DWG sub-committee on privacy and data-related ethical questions?
- Edward Zarecor Schedule a time for us to brainstorm architectural options for supporting per learner block level progress.