Page Comparison

Xavier Antoviaque

Comment during the meeting, or async at https://discuss.openedx.org/t/contributors-meetup-call-for-participation-meeting-time-poll/10990anchor

Jorge Londoño? (Pinged by Natalia in forum discussion)

• https://discuss.openedx.org/t/contributors-meetup-async-update-july-22nd-2023-august-4th-2023/10892/5?u=antoviaque

• https://github.com/openedx/wg-build-test-release/issues/245#issuecomment-1589445603

• Talking about waffle flags - did the decision-making process & doc improve since https://discuss.openedx.org/t/contributors-meetup-async-update-june-24th-2023-july-7th-2023/10645/3 ?

• Jorge will reach out to Feanil Patel to discuss the process or better documenting the waffle flags.

How do we make sure strings in frontend-app-communications are sent to Transifex?

Pierre Mailhot

(and frontend-app-course-authoring, and frontend-lib-content-components that is using it)

• These are included as official in Olive.

• The message are properly handled in the code, but they are not being pushed to Transifex.

• FE App Component is another issue, it is not tagged as it’s a library. There’s also a bug for this library that needs to be address. Adolfo Brandes has context on this issue and will investigate.

• Related bugs and Slack threads:

  • https://github.com/openedx/frontend-app-communications/issues/146

  • Slack thread on frontend-app-communications: https://openedx.slack.com/archives/C037XDB9KN1/p1691157409234449

  • Slack thread on problem editors: https://openedx.slack.com/archives/C049JQZFR5E/p1692114945050299

Review needed on opaque keys PR

Braden MacDonald

https://github.com/openedx/opaque-keys/pull/259

• Looking for a couple of additional outside reviewers

✅ Action items:

• Maria will review, Stefania will ask Ghassan and Alexz will try to get someone from Raccoon Gang.

Maintainership phase 3

Follow-up from last meeting:

• Scope of maintainership determined? edx-platform? all of the repos that are installed as part of open edX?

  • List of repositories that are included in named releases, but don’t have a maintainer, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rMwbRldYwp-xPsAG2vijqwB__9M7P2AgjDxX31G7ucA/edit#gid=965363198

  • The goal is still to include all dependencies from the Open edX stable releases, including edx-platform

• Start date? Pilot Phase 3 indicates Aug 1st 2023

  • New data September 7th

• Still awaiting decision-making?

✅ Action items from the last meeting:

• Jorge Londoño to reach out to Ed to explore how the community can better support the maintainer program Phase Three.

Additional question:

Are all the members of this program contributors? Is that a prerequisite or not?

A: We have made some folks CC’s on a “fast track” to support taking over maintaining repos that don’t have a maintainer. This is decided on a case-by-case basis, but it’s usually non-controversial for repos that are currently without a maintainer.

PR Review Delays

Xavier Antoviaque

Created summary & action items from the discussion thread - do you agree? any takers?

• Advertise to core contributors to take on more permissions rights · Issue #102 · openedx/wg-coordination · GitHub

• Faciliate monitoring and guiding of OSPRs · Issue #103 · openedx/wg-coordination · GitHub

• Core contributors as backup reviewers · Issue #104 · openedx/wg-coordination · GitHub

• Contributor role (vs "core contributor") · Issue #105 · openedx/wg-coordination · GitHub

• Xavier is looking for feedback on these suggestions and potentially additional ideas about how to accelerate reviews

• This is predominately focused on code core contributors, but non-coding contributors can also help with, say, product review.

Site Operations module for the Dev Onboarding course (by Sarina Canelake): “This would be a high level overview of how to get a site running with Tutor. If these instructions exist in any form could someone point me at them?” (ref)

Some work discussed by Matjaz Gregoric and Lawrence McDaniel at https://discuss.openedx.org/t/contributors-meetup-async-update-july-8th-2023-july-21st-2023/10773/9

✅ Action items from the last meeting:

• Jorge Londoño to reach out to Regis regarding the Tutor documentation for the Site Operations Module.

• Edward Zarecor suggests that we create an outline for the proposed course similar to what was done for the demo course.

TOC Decision Requests: Looking for suggestions, comments and questions about OEP-63

Xavier Antoviaque

Without familiarity with the specific issue, Jorge encouraged the team members to review the thread for better insights before the next discussion.

✅ Action items from the last meeting:

• Obtain missing responses and feedback needed on the OEP PR (Xavier Antoviaque Edward Zarecor )

•  Edward Zarecor to review in the next 2 days to try to finalize this OEP.