Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 12 Current »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

12 PM EDT

Zoom link

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

5 mins

Introductions

  • Name, company, areas of architectural interest

20 mins

Mission and Goals

Dave Ormsbee (Axim) , David Joy (Deactivated)

  • Brief overview of OEP-56

    • proposal around ADRs, to add structure and responsibilities

    • someone writing an ADR has the responsibility to get feedback from stakeholders and subject matter experts that are impacted

    • the responsibility of the people creating ADRs to write down all feedback

    • “decision maker’s checklist”

    • it’s not always clear in our community who should be part of the conversation

    • this WG is how to make that a reality

  • Coordination, not review/gatekeeping

  • Goals

    • share where the community is at, what they’re planning to work on

    • make sure forum posts get answered

    • do the connections manually (short term)

    • replace the need for this team (long term)

    • documentation how the arch process happens

  • Feedback / Discussion:

20 mins

How we Work

Dave Ormsbee (Axim)

  • Tactical vs. Strategic work

    • Tactical: How to help groups and individuals in the short term?

    • Strategic: What key initiatives will help teams to make the right decisions in the longer term?

  • Decision making process

  • Meeting cadence

    • 2 weeks (fine to start)

      • But forum triage should happen constantly

      • After three months, should re-evaluate

      • This group has a sunset at some point

      • Andy: want to hook people up as soon as possible, before they have to write a whole ADR. Emphasis on early feedback.

      • Ned: historically, groups have problems making progress on their backlog when not meeting regularly

  • Communications channels

    • Slack group

    • Discourse

      • New category for discussions about the operation of this group

      • Architecture posts go to Development > Architecture

10 mins

Next Steps

  • Suggestions for future agenda items

    • ++++++ Backstage introduction

    • Establishing draft guidelines beyond OEP-56 (or adding them to OEP-56)?

    • ++Architecture process best practices or recommendations we can give to delivery teams

    • ++++How to get that early feedback Andy is talking about above

    • Documentation brainstorming

    • .

    • ++How does this group’s coordination work aid or overlap with the product working group, roadmap, etc?

    • An updated ADR template and where to share it/make it discoverable.

    • +++++Communication to the community about the existence of this group, and to evangelize OEP-56 (which hasn’t happened yet - it has been merged as “provisional”).

    • How to make sure that participation of the knowledge experts does happen in a bound timeframe?

    • +How to track and present current items?

    • Does the group have any kind of structure in terms of roles?

    • How do we track the connections we make for decision makers so that we can feed them into our automated process?

✅ Action items

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels