Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Current »

Use Cases

Adaptive Learning Use Cases

Adaptive Learning Tools

Adaptive Learning Tools

Decoupling Navigation from Course Structure

  • Decoupling Navigation requirements
    • MicroModules
      • tags: discipline, skill or difficulty
      • timescale: recommending no more than 20-30 minutes of material
      • content: summary, video, practical work, self-corrected exercises, guidance, discussion forums, etc.
      • quiz: should always end with an automatically corrected quiz
    • Additional content
      • added along with MicroModules
      • assessments to assess and adapt: chapters, notes, exams, milestones, etc
      • skill recognition and rewards: certificates, badges, percentage of completion, etc.
    • Pathways
      • composition: assembly of MicroModules + Additional content
      • skills matrix: skills metrics associated with each MicroModule
      • milestones: continual evaluation of learner's progress via self-contained evaluations (within MicroModules) or individual assessments (as additional content)
    • MicroModule repository and catalog
  • Knewton's base-level Decoupling Navigation requirements
    • Personalized Next button
    • User identity could be "a data profile that spans multiple adaptive providers, aggregating proficiency, geographical location, profession, and modality preferences"
    • Content identifier should be globally unique
    • Versioning content depending on nature of change

Content Tagging

  • edX Adaptive WG (2016)
    • Flexibility - Abstracting out the taxonomy concept as a separate authorable entity in the platform

    • Versioning - taxonomies change over time
    • Multi-alignment - multiple taxonomies associated with a single course/library
    • Portability - transport across MOOC instances
  • Content Tagging (2017)
    • Product memo with incremental needs based on Credo's work
  • Open Learning Initiative @ Stanford Semantic Tagging requirements (2014)
    • Learning objective = what student will be able to do by the end of the module

    • Learning objective contains skills (sub-objectives)

    • Skill = discrete concept or knowledge component, actionable for instructors

    • OLI courses have 30-50 learning objectives and 100-1,000 skills

  • Resource Tagging (2014) for Open Learning Initiative

    • Tags to associate with course resources in a many-to-many relationship
    • Categories of tags
    • Tags and categories have names and descriptions
    • Tags not in tracking events, but sent with course exports
  • Content Tagging (2014)
    • Use cases
      • OLI's learning objectives and skills
      • MIT's Backstage with learning objective graph and relationships
      • Content library filtering
      • Adaptive
    • xBlock Asides proposed in contrast to Stanford's generic framework
  • No labels