What went well at the 2019 Open edX conference in San Diego? What could have gone better? Add bullet points here, or send an email to oscm@edx.org if you want a more private channel.
Went well:
- Ned caught a behind-the-back throw while juggling on stage
- Thanks to the people who went out during the keynotes and stopped the random loud construction noises
- The #openedx-2019-stories Slack channel worked well, lots of great stuff in there
- Is someone tasked with going through #openedx-2019-stories and reporting out to the rest of the company?
- Thank you for including vegetarian options with each meal
- Signage with arrows were surprisingly accurate this time around. (Not sure how much control over architecture we have... but it worked!)
- Separate locations for plenaries and breakouts/talks was great. Outside space was well-utilized!
- ID Summit as an area of focus was well-received.
Could have gone better:
- Why did the laptop fail, forcing Ned to juggle on stage?
- Let's bring a can of WD40 next time; there were some really squeaky conference room doors there
- For lightning talks, it would be helpful if the tech person renamed the files with the speaker's name-- a lot of them turned out to be called openedx2019_presentation or similar
- The pastry breakfasts weren't useful for me; it would be nice if each meal had some sort of protein
- Would be nice to have tea available every time there is coffee
- Dependent on the specific room door setup, but people entering/exiting during the sessions was sometimes very disruptive. Maybe consider limiting entrance after session start for doors that are right by the presenter
- There was (some) confusion around a-la-carte pricing of Tuesday and Friday.
Ideas for questions to ask attendees on a survey:
- (ideas here)
- Sched prompts for feedback at the end of each day. Can we leverage that better? Is there more success with that mechanism than a big week-later survey?