Versions Compared

Old Version 10

changes.mady.by.user Jenna Makowski

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Jenna Makowski

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Agenda Item

Presenter

Description

Notes/Next steps

Governance and Charter

Jenna Makowski

  1. Jenna to give a brief overview of highlights. Open floor for questions/comments. Agree to a deadline for acceptance and discuss test-drive opportunities.

Charter

Next steps - Get draft text into Wiki and open for next two weeks for in-line commentary, questions, feedback. Discuss outstanding concerns synch/1:1 where needed over next two weeks, and aim to “ratify” by next meeting. Discuss plan to test drive and iterate. It’s not a static document.

Wiki version available: Charter

Project Brief Overview

Faqir Bilal

Faqir to lead discussion on translating the idea board into project briefs. Discuss next steps for building backlog/prioritizing.

Idea Board Project Briefs

Consensus that the proposed template for project briefs works well.

Soft prioritization of the following briefs against the North Star Goal to Define a Core Product Offering:

And continued prioritization of https://openedx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OEPM/pages/3476357132/Idea+Board+Project+Briefs#1.-Governance-model-for-the-Product-Working-Group

Next steps: The goal is to fully flesh the above 3 product briefs by the next meeting. Interested Members can add their names and pair asynchronously.

BTR and Product

Dean Jay Mathew Kyle McCormick Ghassan Maslamani

  • Build-Test-Release (BTR): Update from BTR Working Group about possible synergies/working relationship

General interest in aligning BTR workflows with Product input. Next goal is to flesh https://openedx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OEPM/pages/3476357132/Idea+Board+Project+Briefs#6.-Provide-support-to-other-working-groups

  • Topics to include: Goal to arrive at a shared understanding of what “done” and “shipped in Named Release X” mean/are defined on the Community Roadmap

  • Goal to arrive at a shared understanding of vocabulary for aligning Core Product Offering elements with BTR workflows - ie definitions for “supported”, “included” etc

...

4. ALU project - context and call for user reviewers: Atomic Learning Unit Initiative (soon to be renamed)

5. Item from a previous meeting: Insights from different partners about key challenges/opportunities from the organizations/industries that they work with/in (segmented by verticals or use cases: L&D, higher ed, etc.)

...