2016 Working Group's Use Cases
- Based on pre-test, expert receives most useful and engaging content
- Competency-based personalization
- Learner chooses own pathway1
- Self-organized learner groups
- Profile-based personalization
- Misconception-based personalization
- Aggregate learner comparison for efficiency
- Survey-based starting point in pathway
- Learner creates pathway from Module Repository1
- Spaced repetition for long-term retention
- Behavior-based personalization (part 2 of Use case #1)
1 Uses cases that apply to LabX
Uses Cases Matrix
Uses cases organized by:
- whether the tool needs to statically or dynamically respond to learners interactions.
- whether the primary motivation of the use case is efficiency (speed in learning) or effectiveness (quality of learning).
Efficiency | Effectiveness | |
Static | 1. Pre-test based | 4. Self-organized groups 5. Profile-based |
Dynamic (i.e., Adaptive) | 7. Aggregate learner comparison | 2. Competency-based |
Uses Cases Table
Effectiveness (performance) | Efficiency (speed) | Meta-cognitive | Engaging (motivation) | Retention (long-term) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Static | 1. Pre-test based | |||||
3. Choose your own pathway | ||||||
4. Self-organized groups | ||||||
5. Profile-based | ||||||
8. Survey-based | ||||||
9. Module repository | ||||||
Dynamic (i.e., Adaptive) | 2. Competency-based | |||||
6. Misconception-based | ||||||
7. Aggregate learner comparison | ||||||
10. Spaced repetition | ||||||
11. Behavior-based |