Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Date: May 17, 2023

Participants: Juan Camilo Montoya Stefania Trabucchi Nicole Kessler Cecilia Liu Cassie Zamparini Doug, Harrison, Angie Ruíz Faqir Bilal Ayaz Quraishi Warda,@Ayaz

Agenda:

Continue with the MWG’s OKR list https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10Ju_m1DgERpvfYaFrW7bu5XMU402UqVseCr7IRKBtzw/edit?usp=sharing left from last group meeting, go through items and get clarifications from proposed service providers.

Discussions:

Time

Discussion Item

Action

10:00 am

  • New Member : Doug will replace Cassie as the representative from Open Craft in Marketing Working Group

Welcome

  • New member : Harrison from eduNext has joined in MWG

Welcome

10: 05 am -10:45 am

Faqir Bilal has shared a survey https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/arbisoft.tableau/viz/OpenedXProductNarrativeSurvey/vFpBQap9Qw done by Product Working Group why customers choose Open edX, Open Craft, Racoon Gang and Abstract have done something similar

Stefania Trabucchi ,Doug will work together to help define the persona of Open edX users with the shared results.

Faqir Bilal Asked about the participation of eMOOC in Germany in June, mentioned Edly might send someone too

https://emoocs.hpi.de/index.php/registration/

Juan Camilo Montoya added redesign the default platform footer

Need confirmation and legal advise from Axim/open edX

Overlapping of tasks on identifying successful user stories with social impacts

Combine item 10 and 17 from https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10Ju_m1DgERpvfYaFrW7bu5XMU402UqVseCr7IRKBtzw/edit?usp=sharing , decide how the spotlight and new website section will be presented

Organize Open edX Site Operator training to simplify the Open edX platform configuration efforts

Need Eden Huthmacher clarification on this since she is away today

10:45 am-11:00 am

Ayaz Quraishi mentioned one slack post from Ghassan on low/no lead receiving from Open edX, and other members shared the experiences of receiving edX’s lead requests rather than Open edX from market place. Cecilia Liu asked how to better address to institutes the benefits of adopting Open edX than putting courses with edX. Stefania Trabucchi and Faqir Bilal clarified that edX fee is high and the selection process is very strict.

Need to check with Eden Huthmacher if it is necessary to come up with a process of assigning leads to service providers based on contributions?

Ayaz Quraishi will contact each service provider regarding the solutions and experiences with market place’s lead generation.

Questions: What is the current process of assigning leads of Open edX to service providers?

Angie Ruíz suggested to initiate a filter at market place to differentiate the leads of Open edX and edX, so no unnecessary resources are wasted on chasing after edX’s prospects.

Confirm with Eden Huthmacher to see if it is doable.

Questions: What is the process of assigning leads of Open edX to service providers?

  • No labels