/
Course-Level Assessment Configuration - Comparator Research

Course-Level Assessment Configuration - Comparator Research

General Summary

A few features seem common to high-level grading and configuration:

  • Bottom-up assignment setup

    • While Open edX requires grading to be defined and then assigned to content, most other platforms derive their basic assignment setup from the existence of assignments present within the course.

  • Centralised grading settings

    • Whether from a page marked “Assessment” or the instructor-view of the learner gradebook, there is almost always a page containing a summary of graded content present within the course where things like assignment groupings and other assignment settings are managed.

  • Grade category flexibility

    • Whether pass/fail, letter grades, or other naming, flexibility in how grades are categorised is important for supporting different models of course outcomes.

  • Site-level defaults

    • With different use-cases and expectations, having to configure potentially identical grading setups for each course is an inconvenience that many platforms bypass by providing control over default configurations from within the UI.

Related content

Open edX - Course-Level Assessment Configuration Improvements
Open edX - Course-Level Assessment Configuration Improvements
More like this
Course-Level Assessment Configuration
Course-Level Assessment Configuration
More like this
Overall Assessment Configuration Analysis
Overall Assessment Configuration Analysis
More like this
Assessment Setup - Comparator Research
Assessment Setup - Comparator Research
More like this
Assessment Content Creation
Assessment Content Creation
More like this
Robust Grades Design
Robust Grades Design
More like this