DEPR Meeting Notes (2022)
Current Agenda
Agenda (15 December 2022)
Auth DEPR tickets announced
FC of assorted DEPR tickets had a few PRs merged
Configuration deprecation discussion cont’d
subtasks:
Feanil mentioned that he might be able to make a first draft of this
Try to shave off all the things that are no longer getting used first
Still used for anything that is not containerized
Devstack images are being moved off using configuration
Olive was released(?)
keep an ear out for release notes feedback
can review the release notes
make sure that we have corresponding MFE DEPR tickets
old discussions UI - can we make a DEPR for this?
add a step for creating a DEPR along with the MFE creation
2U internal - find out details about who owns this and get a DEPR ticket created
Past Agendas
Agenda (1/4/22)
Happy new year!
Build jenkins vs. tools jenkins
Can we move all public-facing jobs to Github?
Codejail CI is still running on build Jenkins
arbi-bom are looking into Codejail
arch-bom has tickets around figuring out what to do with the remaining jobs
We want to move all edX-specific things to a single jenkins.
Bok Choy DEPR discussion
DEPR-174: bok-choy: remove supporting tooling & archive repoAbandoned
edx-e2e-tests use bok choy.
This is an edX-private repo
We have cypress e2e tests
@Diana Huang - Reach out to Incident Management about accelerating work so we can get rid of bok-choy.
Maple released!
Can move edx-certificates to edx-unsupported now that we’re not on Lilac anymore
tCRIL to take on the work for moving this @Dave Ormsbee (Axim)
Related: moving edx-ease to edx-unsupported/archiving it
Now that MFEs are supported in Maple, we can start looking into removing legacy frontend code
Moving DEPR to a Github project
What would this entail?
Github project can encompass multiple repos, but we would need to turn on Github issues for affected repos to make this effective.
Hopes and dreams (deprecation-wise)
The One Jenkins
Old Mongo
Ecommerce
Bandwidth to deprecate the stuff we said we’d get rid of
@Diana Huang movement on blended brief for DEPR bucket
Asgard/Minos
Configuration repo (please!)
Devstack → Tutor!
maybe even by Nutmeg!
Agenda (1/18/22)
Blended brief
Suggestion from Marco: create several themes of DEPR work in the brief that we can argue for separately
ex: Dependence on unsupported libraries
ex: Multiple versions of same feature is confusing to developers and creates churn
ex: Incomplete Migrations
ex: MFE replacement work
Go through DEPR board and see what fits where - what other work can we think of that needs to go in the list?
List updated
Maintenance Costs Brainstorm
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GqzWcrm3rY8v9W6bqXa0hXBJk7VKx8mSGxKETwzeNjU/edit
What can we do to formalize this?
Move to Confluence, ensure is public, linked to from DEPR pages for reference
OEP updates
Moving everything to Github issues: https://github.com/openedx/open-edx-proposals/pull/285
Concerns?
What about edX depr work?
Internal work should be tracked by internal groups.
Add info to PR
Does this mean we have to turn on issues for all repos? Does tCRIL own this decision?
This is definitely going to happening, according to tCRIL
We are planning on all working group work being on Github projects
bring up with David Joy to make sure we have a story around this.
TBA what we can do to support this migration.
We can make draft tickets duplicating DEPR tickets now and then convert to issues once the issues are turned on in the relevant repos.
@Diana Huang will make a few of the issues in ‘Removing’ and ‘Accepted’
Entrance Exams
We don’t have an owner for the work to keep this going from core-contributors or http://edx.org
We can try to reach out to the folks who commented on the DEPR ticket to find out more about their instances and who maintains them.
Agenda (2/1/22)
Elasticsearch update
edX/2U will do discovery on the feasibility of getting rid of ES by Nutmeg
Hopefully will have an answer by Feb 22
OEP updates
Turning on issues seems fraught internal to edX/2U
Can we start with a dedicated depr project, then move to repo issues? Does Github support this?
We only want to allow DEPR tickets for now.
This is a test case for turning on issues more broadly for the openedx.
We can move issues between repos if we need to.
Ex of issue creation that we can make use of to ensure only DEPR issues get created: https://github.com/github/docs/issues/new/choose
@Diana Huang will continue working on migration of issues to depr.
[Jeremy] How can we enable this WG’s members to spend more time following through on deprecation work?
Teams are overallocated and understaffed on work, hard to carve out time.
We should talk about this during future meetings: what kind of work can we do in the next two weeks?
Could we engage more actively with the community?
Could we reschedule to be more Europe-friendly? Lots of competition for those timeslots
Show up to the community working group meetings and invite more people to this group or to engage with this group via Slack/Discourse
Question: MySQL 8?
Target is currently allowing Nutmeg with a setting.
Need to do cleanup work on old migrations.
Talk with OpenCraft about this work to keep up us from duplicating work.
Bok choy DEPR update
We are seeing good progress around this, and we might be able to move forward on this deprecation over the next two weeks
Engage squad is working on DEPR work
Removing legacy courseware views
Move test modulestore to use split modulestore
Talk to Kyle about this
Hide old mongo from Studio and Courseware
Jenkins deprecation
Last thing is the codejail tests
Hard to run on Github actions due to AppArmor, but we’re trying to solve this via self-hosted runners on VMs instead of Docker
Be prepared to put Build Jenkins behind the VPN and make it private, but wait until the codejail tests get migrated to Github actions
What can we do over this next week?
Make sure bok-choy DEPR ticket gets announced
Diana will poke Kyle about this
If this is ready, we can move this into unsupported
Kill off old ES clusters
What can we do help with the Mongo deprecation?
Braden has a PR for switching from Mongo active versions
Forums? Focus on killing the Ruby in favor of Python client
Check in with them about this. Where is it in their roadmap?
Dave and Mike will talk about old Mongo deprecation work
Agenda (2/15/22)
Transition from Jira to GitHub Issues
Ready to move/copy all edx-platform related tickets?
Create new issues at https://github.com/openedx/public-engineering/issues/new/choose
Github Depr Board: https://github.com/orgs/openedx/projects/9
Jira Board: https://openedx.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/DEPR/boards/452
Should we draft up a moving process?
May not be needed yet as long as we focus on the edx-platform tickets for now.
Or rather, just put them all in the generic repo for now, and we can move them to more relevant code repos later if appropriate
Spreadsheet to avoid duplication of ticket moving effort: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AJQXLP_8tCnFe4wB_erPW_wN8D8rlTGd1sls5NKnfDg/edit#gid=159525103
Please sign up before copying a ticket over! First column
Copy description and any major updates in the comments which aren’t yet included in the Jira description
Link back to the Jira issue
@Jeremy Bowman (Deactivated) will work with Diana to add a new “Migrated” status or such to the Jira board for tickets that have moved over to GitHub Issues before completion.
Persistent grades - should this be made the default and remove the option of doing otherwise?
Feels appropriate for a DEPR ticket, removing the ability to have non-persistent grades
@Dave Ormsbee (Axim) will write this up
codejail CI is just about moved from Jenkins to GitHub Actions, should be able to make that Jenkins server private soon
DEPR blended project brief has been written, will move forward once Jeremy has time to review and Diana has time to nudge it along (both should happen relatively soon)
@Feanil Patel will review other feature flags that are currently off by default but really should be on by default (completion, etc.)
Should internal and external DEPR channels be joined?
The internal one has been very low traffic since the WG became public, may make more sense to archive instead. We’ll give it a little time to see if it gets usefully used for 2U-private code deprecation.
A PR for https://openedx.atlassian.net/browse/DEPR-151 is in progress
Arbi-BOM is making headway on https://openedx.atlassian.net/browse/DEPR-150 , hoping for completion shortly
Not a DEPR ticket, but removal of legacy a11y testing cruft removed 21K lines of code in edx-platform: https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/pull/29813
Agenda (3/1/22)
Ready to archive the unused https://github.com/openedx/ease repo; does it merit a full DEPR ticket or simply an announcement?
Early discussion in
https://openedx.slack.com/archives/CGB0S3L12/p1645564636154829
and
https://openedx.slack.com/archives/CGB0S3L12/p1645564797167289
We don’t think this has been working on any Open edX release for the last 4 years.
Does this pass the ‘statute of limitations'?
Action item: Move to openedx-unsupported and see who complains.
What do do with edx-notifications?
No active development since 2020. Make a DEPR ticket?
Action item: @Diana Huang Make a DEPR ticket, go through the DEPR process.
Looking for advice on how to proceed with bok-choy, now that’s it’s deprecated. -Kyle
Add information on the ticket to indicate timelines and let tCRIL know when it’s ready to be moved to unsupported.
Action Items:
Keep tabs on progress moving edX e2e tests off of this so we’re ready.
Would folks be willing to move this wiki page tree (https://openedx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/COMM/pages/825983190 ) under https://openedx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/COMM/pages/46793351 ? -Kyle
Yes, I will move this to working groups.
https://github.com/openedx/devstack/issues/907 -Kyle
FYI for now.
Should we turn this into bunch of smaller tickets?
This doesn’t quite make sense, because people are going to switch in bulk.
What is the plan for Nutmeg?
Plan: support both Tutor and devstack in Nutmeg
Can we target a number of adoption by Nutmeg?
Announce now to start the conversation early.
Can we tie the DEPR and tech radar together through automation
Github Issues: How do we refer to them?
Just by their repo/issue number.
With all the MFE-ficiation happening, how can we use DEPR to better prepare the community for upcoming frontend changes and make sure that all necessary concerns are gathered?
Case study: DEPR-42 and the following custom payment processor debacle. This is still an open issue.
Upcoming: frontend-app-authn and frontend-app-discussions.
Can we surface decisions made and support dropped on DEPR tickets or somewhere are?
Nascent Product Process and working group that might be the long game
Make sure we pay attention to the release boundaries?
Ideal: experimental named release, default named release, removed named release
In the case of smaller features: default named release, removed named release
Can we include Discussion MFE in Nutmeg in an experimental version?
Bring this discussion to the BTR group.
We need to make sure teams in 2U/edX make DEPR tickets.
Add deltas in feature sets to the DEPR tickets.
Old Mongo deprecation continues - we turned off enrollments. And working on turning off marketing pages.
Unblock removing legacy tabs for migration to the learning MFE
Unit tests now use split mongo by default! A lot of tests have been migrated to use split.
Announced DEPR for start/due dates outside of Sections and Subsections. - Dave
Match what is available in Studio.
Can we write a management command/coursegraph query that will find any courses that do this?
@Dave Ormsbee (Axim) to write a course graph query for this.
Continuing to move things from Jira to Github
Any help here is welcome.
Sidebar: Jira DEPR workflow can’t be updated without IT intervention.
When migrating from Jira to Github issues, leave a comment on the Jira ticket and close it.
Agenda(Ides of March)
Should we do a blog post about moving to GitHub issues?
Where would this blog post go?
Open edX blog?
What would be the purpose?
An announcement to the community?
An exploration of the process?
A chance to recruit more people to help with DEPR work?
We should talk about this next meeting, hopefully with more people attending.
DEPR Blended updates
Raccoon Gang has bandwidth (and is in a safe place!), so we’re working with them to get some of our DEPR tickets over the line.
Blended brief was moved from 2U to tCRIL for this
Raccoon Gang discovered that we lost some links to old Google Drive documents. If you run across anything that is broken, feel free to reach out to Diana about finding a copy of it.
Diana will update Jira/Github issues with the new public links to the documents she has already found.
Old Mongo updates
Tests on edx-platform have been converted to use Split Mongo.
Recruitment
https://discuss.openedx.org/t/adr-for-removing-mongodb-from-edx-platform/6001/9
How do we support this? Can we help make this easier/less intimidating? Can we help do the work?
For this work, one of the avenues is going through and removing usage of Old Mongo in tests (this is fairly simple).
How can we get work that needs to get done in front of other eyes? Larger discussion about interaction with the community.
There are still three big things that need to happen to get things out of edx-platform.
These are parallelizable.
They all require migrations.
Can we do this as a blended project?
Check 2U budget on this and TNL bandwidth.
Forums is also a sticking point. There’s a forums project going on at 2U that will need to be accounted for.
MySQL 8 and Nutmeg
BTR wants confirmation that MySQL will work for Nutmeg.
http://edx.org will probably not be migrated in time, but the community should be safe to move to it.
Rescheduling meeting
We will try rescheduling this to 11am EST for now and see if that helps at all.
Agenda (March 29, 2022)
Blog post about moving to Github issues?
What is the focus? Which blog?
We could also make it a discuss post - in announcements
More of an inform rather a discussion about the complications around the move
Jira to Github move might have some interesting topics
Lack of integration with Slack - updates don’t immediately show up in the Slack channel like they did with Jira
Subtasks are pretty good in Github issues
DEPR blended project updates
RG has begun working through the EdxRestApiClient DEPR and will continue to go through it until it is completed or we run out of hours for them.
[DEPR]: EdxRestApiClient #37
[DEPR]: Remove legacy course info page & related code
[DEPR]: Remove Enterprise Catalog API V1 from edx-enterprise
[DEPR]: Retire LegacyWaffle classes #28
[DEPR]: Remove VerifiedTrackCohort #63
[DEPR]: Cleanup: Remove last vestiges of save option from anonymous_id_for_user #35
[DEPR]: Replace PDF course certificate view code in edx-platform #27
[DEPR]: Remove edx-jsme, Molecular Structure Problem type #14
[DEPR]: Account pages -> micro-frontend #71
[DEPR]: ecommerce Basket Page -> micro-frontend #68
Discovered usages of bok choy that we didn’t previously know about in ecommerce and credentials.
Old Mongo updates
@Dave Ormsbee (Axim) and @Michael Terry (Deactivated) do you want to give async updates on this work?
@Michael Terry (Deactivated) says: I’m planning on removing acces to Old Mongo next Monday (April 4th)
Removing access to old mongo courses - approved a while ago and unclear when it will land
Once this lands, we can start removing pieces of old mongo
Write out subtasks, game plan for removal after this.
Can maybe include this work in our blended project with Raccoon Gang
site_configuration https://github.com/openedx/platform-roadmap/issues/21
Github issue about deprecating it in public engineering (roadmap?)
Concerns brought up during a contributor’s meeting
Previously discussed with Sarina
Maybe we should put it through the proper DEPR process so we can formally abandon it if there’s enough pushback
There’s a separate possible option eox_tenant for multitenancy as a replacement - should get feedback from the rest of the community
Action item: move/create depr ticket and announce with a longer acceptance period to see if eox_tenant is a good replacement - follow up to see if we have a point person on this discussion, then let them take care of announcement.
@Michael Terry (Deactivated) async update: I have PRs to remove legacy outline & dates tabs, but since we’re so close to the Nutmeg cutoff, I’ll just wait until after then (April 11th) to land them, to let Open edX have another release with the legacy views still supported.
April 12, 2022
[Feanil] Comms improvement as things are going away(From core-contributors meetup)
Can we have more details in the deprecation section of the Release notes?
What are other things we can do to make the DEPR board easier to consume as a summary of work.
Take a look at what landed between releases
do lookups/create filter for the DEPR board for each release - what got removed between these two dates
create label ‘needs release notes’ for DEPR tickets
badger people until they’re added to the release notes
archive things at the Open edX release boundary
add agenda item for WG
@Feanil Patel talk to BTR about contacting DEPR after a new release has been cut in order to trigger our own process
@Diana Huang take ideas and turn into a checklist for next release
Working Group Meetup at Open edX Conference
Feanil will be our representative
Blended project update
Making progress through EdxRestApiClient
Starting on other tickets
Old Mongo progress
remove legacy outline and dates tabs
preview mode in studio still relies on the courseware endpoints and template rendering
TNL has a ticket for handling this case
site_configuration DEPR ticket still needs to be created
Agenda (4/26/22)
Flags that should maybe be enabled by default/flag should be removed.
[Request] Review the flags as a group and figure out which ones to DEPR
Process: Do we want a depr ticket for each of these? Should we batch them together?
Change defaults for the ones we believe should be a different default
Add something to the next release notes about the flip
Next steps:
1 DEPR for Studio login flow
1 DEPR for removing the ones that we want to remove
Removal will happen after Olive is cut.
Announcement in Discourse about turning these flags true
Also add to release notes for Olive that we are changing these defaults
Name | Current Value | Notes | Next Steps |
---|
Name | Current Value | Notes | Next Steps |
---|---|---|---|
False | Go with mobile ready by default? | Flip to True by default
| |
False | This is the CMS sign-in endpoint, which should be deprecated if we're defaulting to lms login. | Make a DEPR ticket for this and the next one around removing the CMS login page entirely in favor of the Oauth flow. | |
False | The related CMS sign-up URL which should also be dropped with the lms login. |
| |
False | Should we enable this by default? | Default to true | |
False | Apparently needed to enable the mobile REST Api | Default to true Possibly should just be removed as a toggle. | |
False | Should probably be enabled by default | Could break apps or other things that can’t handle unicode | |
False | Seems like it should be enabled by default | Default to true Should be removed Ensure that we also have defaults for any other configuration needed |
edx-microsite and remaining microsite cleanup
move into edx-unsupported
Enterprise Catalog v1 deprecation
might have some ecommerce calls to the old thing in edx-enterprise
check in with enterprise engineering at 2U about the status of this migration
legacy frontend deprecation timeline
proposal: toggle them off by default in Olive, remove code for the release after
Create PRs right now, but wait until after Olive is cut to merge
These are the templates/code that live in edx-platform and ecommerce
Re-announce the appropriate deprecation tickets to ensure everyone sees them
make forum threads in Discourse to discuss the timeline for these removals
Agenda (May 10, 2022)
Review steps for deprecating toggles and switching defaults
actually do the work for creating tickets and swapping these toggles
1 DEPR for Studio login flow overall
this is technically two toggles
@Feanil Patel
2 DEPR tickets for removing the ones that we want to remove
OAuth2 Provider & Milestones App
Removal will happen after Olive is cut.
@Feanil Patel
Announcement in Discourse about turning these flags true
@Diana Huang
Also add to release notes for Olive that we are changing these defaults
Can we ensure that this gets picked up by the diff in documentation?
@Diana Huang
Change the defaults
@Diana Huang
Working group support for DEPR blended project
Enterprise catalog version 1?
@Diana Huang
JSME removal from edx-platform
@Peter Pinch
@Dave Ormsbee (Axim)
course info pages
@Feanil Patel
Old Mongo progress
Find epic of this work
@Dave Ormsbee (Axim) to map out next steps of this work
Review DEPR board
VerifiedTrackCohort