| | | Notes, decisions and action items |
|---|
Jan 26, 2021 | @Ned Batchelder (Deactivated)@Giovanni Cimolin da Silva @Marco Morales (Deactivated) | | Deep-Linking (5-6 PRs) in progress / ready for review N+P Service with no PII at platform level feature N+P with PII to include additional toggles / settings Vocareum is working on 1.3 support Documentation task - in progress
|
Jan 14, 2021 | @Ned Batchelder (Deactivated), @Robyn Belair (Deactivated), @Marco Morales (Deactivated) | Review Project Status Action Item Catch-Up
| |
Jan 12, 2021 | @Ned Batchelder (Deactivated) @Giovanni Cimolin da Silva | | Deep linking implementation is underway Pull requests are nearly ready for simple data presentation: HTML, image, link. Deep-linking to a file will require the LMS store the file.
Context membership service is an uneasy fit for edX moocs. Giovanni will write an ADR about how we will implement the context membership service TNL overall is interested in LTI independence from XBlock.
|
Notes Gap | | | |
Sep 22, 2020 | @Ned Batchelder (Deactivated) , @Giovanni Cimolin da Silva , @Marco Morales (Deactivated) | | |
Sep 16, 2020 | @Ned Batchelder (Deactivated) , @Giovanni Cimolin da Silva , @David Joy (Deactivated) , @Marco Morales (Deactivated) | | Large LineItem Service PR plus tests might be split as much as possible for review (TNL-7318) ADR in progress Many other services to be pulled into the next sprint Certification testing issues / fixes delayed until another round of this testing (this is in progress still) LTI Standard Question re Deep-Linking naming
|
Sep 10, 2020 | @Ned Batchelder (Deactivated) , @Giovanni Cimolin da Silva , @David Joy (Deactivated) , @Marco Morales (Deactivated) | | Discussed Project status / history Next steps and sprint goals Open action items including LTI v1.3 test suite still an open task. ADR is still in draft and being reviewed.
|
Aug 11, 2020 | , @Giovanni Cimolin da Silva , @David Joy (Deactivated) , @Marco Morales (Deactivated) | Open PRs / Items Project Timeline / Delay or Pause | Open PRs / Items Project Timeline / Delay or Pause Discussed parallelization options for rest of project Discussed timeline + planning which will pick up once project resumes. Tickets / project items can be flagged as low or high review dependency to provide visibility into edx support / review time.
|
Aug 4, 2020 | @David St. Germain (Deactivated) , @Giovanni Cimolin da Silva , @David Joy (Deactivated) , @Marco Morales (Deactivated) | LTI Line Item Service PRs can be reviewed IMS Testing Tools - Paired Question: LTI Optional Metadata / Parameters (is this enabled today??)
| |
Jul 21, 2020 | @Giovanni Cimolin da Silva , @David Joy (Deactivated) , @Marco Morales (Deactivated) | Status LTI Testing Tool Timeline Review
| This sprint → reference implementation for context claim support, won’t include full ADR details this sprint. Need to do a version bump for LTI Release latest Discussed score / results service questions / issues, some open issues on handling multiple line items and which to set as the grade in the gradebook. LTI Testing Tool - Access questions, Marco to add action item for this LTI Provider Review scope TBD - uses external python library currently. Timeline check-in
|
Jul 14, 2020 | @David St. Germain (Deactivated) , @Giovanni Cimolin da Silva , @David Joy (Deactivated) , @Marco Morales (Deactivated) | Status Update Review to start. LTI Provider injection included LTI Variables - Unique identifiers (block location) this discussion is on the ADR discussed whether unique identifiers exist for course tabs or other levels of the course hierarchy. resource link ID necessary for LTI Launch
LTI configuration in Studio for Course level still TBD, team is building this into Django admin for now. Open question about how to handle configuration for LTI to be used throughout the platform. For now focused on course level configuration. ADR for Studio / LMS boundary discussed → What are the implications for LTI here? ADR exists for whether or not to include LTI keys. can easily include in export for 1.1 but not for 1.3. LTI launches focused on learning content primarily, also course tabs. Potential future use in course content sidebar but this is TBD. for now centralized configuration is the important part, can explore multiple UIs for configuration or additional slots in the future. example - Piazza or Yellowdig might have configuration for main app + sidebar (if they eventually support in-context discussion)
| |
July 28, 2020 | @Giovanni Cimolin da Silva , @David Joy (Deactivated) , @Marco Morales (Deactivated) | Pausing work for now. Needs review: TNL-7318 - line items implementation. POC implementation, decided to split the work into smaller pull requests. Move configuration to model, second one to improve auth around LTI, and third to implement line items. First is up for review. This blocks the other steps.
| |