Updates (round robin style) on next step deliverables for in-flight project
Share tool for tracking fine-grained work - wiki space
Decide owners for remaining un-owned backlog items
Topic
Presenter
Notes
Topic
Presenter
Notes
Round robin progress updates (4min each)
RBAC (Bryan)
In internal solution review next week
Focused on the LMS
Initial focus was on “instructor, no editor”, but OpenCraft submitted a PR, limited author, that met this need, this covers the Studio use cases (edx-platform#32570)
They focus on LMS actions.
Will share proposal for feedback next week.
OpenCraft are actively developing an additional role with a deadline of September, best efforts will be made to coordinate, modulo deadlines.
Next step: Create an MVP product spec that includes:
Admin dashboard experience that includes basic reports on instance/org health, growth, stats, and what those reports include
Course team dashboard experience that includes reports on course data, learner progress, and to identify at-risk learners, and what those reports include
Course team experience to pull reports at the problem/assessment level, and what those reports include
Graded Discussions (Cassie/Jenna/Elizabeth/Aamir)
On deck: Draft a spec with refined list of MVP requirements
Outlined MVP scope a couple weeks ago.
Jenna owns the work of putting together a draft approach doc and sharing.
Goal was to align various stakeholder on approach.
Mike Leary from 2U lead a design sprint to reimagine what Studio Home might become.
Jenna and @Brad Brown are prioritizing the stories that emerged from the design sprint.
Brad and Jenna aim to have the list of specs ready by the end of next week.
Review in August, shovel ready around the end of August
@Jeremy Ristau discussed with @Felipe Montoya and wanted the 2U team to handle the initial technical build to prepare to accept PRs on a solid foundation.
There probably needs to be some further clarification of implementation roles and responsibilities.
Will this work be phased? Yes. 12 month time horizon is the expectation. Broad agreement on 12 month roadmap, we’ll review each phase independently.
ORA rubric (Ed)
No substantive update
Central LTI config management (Fox/Jenna)
MVP Spec for LTI Consumer Strategy is here:
Pearson has submitted some PRs related to this
OpenCraft is reviewing how/if their work would need to be adjusted given the Pearson contributions, which were developed by eduNEXT on Pearson’s behalf.
3rd party plagiarism tools (Felipe)
Currently doing a technical design using filters to send data to the turn it in API.
Flexible grading (Jenna)
No immediate updates. Looking at this in terms of the overall grading strategy and the core product definition work.
Credentials (Ed)
V1 completing now, I believe the final PRs have merged today.
SF Integration (Elizabeth/Fox)
@Paulo Viadanna has been driving, but is on vacation
ASU have a successful integration for 3 separate projects
They’ve contributed some changes to the APIs that they have or will upstream
One API they have created is a course clone API to allow SalesForce to clone courses.
ASU are using the EDU package as standard extension
We can get a writeup of how this works from @Paulo Viadanna and the ASU SF admin, Molly Leonard.
ASU are using lambda code to bridge between SF and Open edX – not sure what the priority can be, but can provide a write-up.
Some of the technical features like queuing and error process are still work in progress.
Blueprint/children courses (Jenna)
Need to align this plan with the Modular Learning roadmap.
We anticipate templating to be part of that scope, but the time line is probably later.
Is this a blocker for any team?
ASU, want this, but not a blocker
Completion API (Felipe)
Not updates at this time.
Need the same extension points as are required for graded discussions
More flexible grouping options (Felipe)
Starting the work on a technical proof of concept
Does this require more product review at this time or are they good to move forward with implementation?
@Matthew Harrington is working on a comprehensive review of grouping and cohorting features.
The research is available, but we don’t yet have a spec. That work is queued, not done.
Individual Student Emails (Felipe)
Initial conversations about the Edly messenger tool, but that hasn’t moved forward.
@Jenna Makowski will reach out about two demos that we would like from the Edly team