Adaptive Learning for Professional Ed

Adaptive Learning for Professional Ed

McGraw-Hill (article)

  • Meta-cognitive: know thyself → confidence

  • Efficiency: deliberate practice

  • Engaging: challenged appropriately, per game design

  • Retention: long-term knowledge via spaced repetition

Area-9 Learning (infographic)

  • Corporate training that

    • meets them where they are

    • meets the specific needs of their job

  • One-size-fits-none, "Biological approach"

  • Designing learning programs → creating customized learning paths.

  • Retention: Recharges your brain

  • Efficiency: Cuts down on learning time by 50%

  • Meta-cognitive: Uncovers what you don't know you don't know

  • Track Progress: Enables reporting

BitSchool (whitepaper)

CogBooks (whitepaper)

  • Categories of self-paced learning platforms

    • Linear - fixed linear sequences.

      • Negatives: Inefficient; Disengaging

    • Macro-adaptive - pre-determined sequence based on either

      1. Learner's preference

        • Negatives: Not supported by research; Extensive authoring effort

      2. Learner's performance on pretests 

        • Negatives: "Snapshots" of learner's competency gets outdated; Over-reliance on tests

    • Micro-adaptive - continuously tailor learning delivery based on the student’s ongoing actions at every step.

      • Positives:

        • Dynamically adjust based on most recent actions.

        • Skip unnecessary activities.

        • Automated, personalized support.

      • 3 types:

        1. Preference-based - adapt based on learner's style and behavior

          • Negatives: Not supported by research; Extensive authoring effort

        2. Rule-based - pre-programmed sequence based on user's actions.

          • Negatives: Limited extendibility; Extensive authoring effort

          • Most applicable to subjects such as basic math and basic science.

        3. Algorithm-based - data-driven algorithms determine sequence as student progresses.

          • Positives:

            • Less authoring effort.

            • Data-driven: amenable to self-improvement and data analysis.

          • 3 types:

            • Memory retention - spaced repetition (per pedagogical research)

              • Most applicable to memory intensive learning activities such as learning language vocabulary or medical exam study.

            • Assessment-driven - optimizes individual assessments and dynamically adjust sequence of assessments.

              • Assessments ranked by:

                • differentiation (how well they assess what the learner knows)

                • difficulty (the relative likelihood that a member of the population will get the assessment correct)

              • Frequently uses Item Response Theory.

              • Negatives: Heavy focus on testing detracts from learning effectiveness.

              • Most applicable to test preparation, exercise drills, and teach-to-test scenarios.

            • Integrated network - Algorithm determines next best learning item, relying on relationships identified between learning activities.

              • Inputs include: learner’s knowledge profile, learner’s behavior, retention, recommendation, and profile data.

              • Positives: highly personalized at each step; flexible; scalable for authors; content agnostic; based on recent learning theory.